Economics

1698 readers

9 users here now

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

379

Landlords should have to pay income tax on their rental properties regardless of whether they're rented out or not. (gothamist.com)

submitted 1 year ago by CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to c/economics@lemmy.ml

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a long history of passing costs onto the consumer. If costs go up for empty units, rents go up on occupied units to cover and / or recoup those costs.

This would also disincentives property owners from doing renovations by adding additional costs, since the units need to be vacant during construction.

Without functional regulations and protections around rents and renters, all of the pressure will just gets pushed down stream to impact the most vulnerable.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 1 points 1 year ago

That's certainly a risk, but it might be easier said than done to raise rents if some landlords decide to bring their warehoused units back to market. Of course, if they're colluding and what's actually going on is a capital strike, then all bets are off. One way or another, capital needs to be disciplined.

Absolutely, we need regulations to protect tenants and keep rents under control. We also need a massive effort to increase the supply of publicly owned housing. I think part of this has to include public acquisition of private housing, but it will help to start squeezing the landlords before hand with various measures in order to minimize the expenditure.