this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
563 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

59676 readers
3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
563
Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists (www.kcl.ac.uk)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists::Researchers call for tighter regulations following major age and race-based discrepancies in AI autonomous systems.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rDrDr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even Comma.AI, which is vision-only internally, still implicitly relies on the cars built in radar for collision detection and blind spot monitoring. It's just Tesla.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, that's because most cars aren't equipped with cameras for blind spot detection.

[–] rDrDr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thats because cameras aren't good for blind spot detection. Moreover, even for cars that have cameras on the side, the Comma doesn't use them. AFAIK, in my car with 360 cameras, the OEM system doesn't use the cameras either for blind spot.