Harry Potter

887 readers

1 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

-5

HBO Says ‘Harry Potter’ Series Will ‘Benefit’ From J.K. Rowling’s Involvement: She ‘Has the Right to Express Her Personal Views’ (variety.com)

submitted 1 month ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/harrypotter@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

HBO defended J.K. Rowling's involvement in its upcoming "Harry Potter" TV series, emphasizing her creative contributions and her right to express personal views despite controversy over her anti-trans statements.

Rowling's outspoken gender-related beliefs have deeply divided the Harry Potter fanbase, with some advocating for boycotts and others finding ways to reconcile their love for the franchise while opposing her views.

Despite fan backlash and fractured enthusiasm, the "Wizarding World" franchise remains commercially strong, and Rowling appears unfazed by criticism, continuing to focus on her advocacy and involvement in the new series.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She's neither necessary nor useful to a series based on an established set of books

Do you think it would be possible to make the series faithful to the books (or at least more than the films were) without her involvement?

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yes.

How is it that hard? I'm assuming the producers, directors, script-writers and so on can read. The books are not that long (even Phoenix is not that long in the grand scheme of things).

The only reason to get her involved is to provide "extra" background detail that doesn't appear in the books at which point they have stopped being faithful to the books and are just made up bollocks.

So either you have a series that is faithful to the books, or faithful to her original vision which will be nothing like the books we all know and (I would assume) love, or we get a series that is something like the films which I happen to think were great and -- in places -- a vast improvement on the books.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

Absolutely. All it takes is a competent script writer and director. Adapting a book to a movie is harder because you have to cut material for time. A series based on a book, you have plenty of time, so you can pretty much take the dialogue as written, and the rest is about set construction and costuming with whatever effects are needed.

It isn't like it was with game of thrones where the series wasn't finished. Even there, they diverged from the books enough that they didn't really need Martin the last two seasons if they wanted to diverge even more and ignore what he intended as the finale.