this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
478 points (92.8% liked)

Political Memes

5501 readers
2089 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 9 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I would never deny any claim of genocide, regardless of evidence, because that's against .world's rules. If someone tells me that France is genociding Belgians, I won't question or dispute it because that's against the rules. But the thing is that when a genocide has clear, documented evidence, I just find that a lot more emotionally compelling. I connect more with what's happening when I can see a shitton of photo and video evidence of dead children in the streets than when all I have to go on is random hearsay. I guess you could say I'm a very visual person.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This comment was reported.

Instead of taking any actions, I'll just ask this:

If the people committing the crime are great at controlling the media, it didn't happen?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Good question.

I sometimes think about the fact that JFK fired Alan Dulles, the guy in charge of assassinating world leaders, months before he was assassinated, and that Dulles was then on the investigative committee into his death. Now, does that prove Dulles was behind the assassination? No. But it does make me go "Hmm." But it is worth noting that if that was what happened, I certainly wouldn't have the means at my disposal to prove it. I wasn't on the investigative committee, after all.

Now, I might choose to believe that's what happened, or that there was a possibility that that's what happened. You might not. That's fine. But what would be less fine would be if I declared anyone who doubted my conjecture and wanted concrete proof to be a redfash who blindly believes anything the US government says and should be banned and excluded from conversation.

[–] diplodocus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago

I've decided to write a seperate comment for it, so... what's that?

is it a hospital? a school? what is its purpose and why is it in the dessert

[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago

look at upper austria!!! there's no koncentration camp here

oh

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Pics or it didn't happen

does this also apply to drawn/CGI or whatever of people being killed, or is it only real people?