this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
554 points (94.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9678 readers
1018 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: to clarify: the message in the ad is actually ironic/satirical, mocking the advice for cyclists to wear high-viz at night.

It uses the same logic but inverts the parts and responsabilities, by suggesting to motorists (not cyclists) to apply bright paint on their cars.

So this ad is not pro or against high-viz, it's against victim blaming

Cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113544508246569296

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 98 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

To be fair, cars have headlight and taillights.

Here in Sweden cars are required to allways have their headlights on when the car is moving, making them far easier to see even during the day.

It us frankly one of the most annoying things about crossing the street when being abroad, cars having their headlights off during the day, it is much more difficult to see if a car is moving if it has the headlights turned off, than if they are on.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Right. You're not going to see the car color at night.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Wait what? There are countries where you can drive without headlights?

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Here in the U.S., (and I'm assuming it's the same elsewhere, but just explaining for simplicity), cars used to have a simple headlight switch, which also lit up the instrument cluster on the dashboard. It was an easy heuristic: If you can't see the gauges because it's dark, turn on the headlights.

Now, every car has a marketing-gimmick dashboard lit up all the time with all sorts of multi-color lights. In the cars I've been in, the headlight indicator just a small, green light in the corner. Drivers accustomed to the old way think that their headlights are on because the dashboard is lit up. The Toyota Prius was notorious for this when it was new; I used to joke that they didn't come with headlights as a way to save fuel.

It's not as bad now, but people just forget o sometimes. It's worse when cars have day-time running lights, because then the drivers see light coming from the front of the car and think all the marker lights are on.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Places I've lived in the US people keep them off as the default. Here in Seattle people don't even turn them on at night half the time, I guess they think the street lighting is good enough. I try and signal people to turn on their lights if I'm biking at night and so far none that I know of have actually turned them on

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

ho, you are still using street ligths?

It’s been years that we cut them on a lot of major axis and after midnight in my town for all the classic roads.

It’s mainly to reduce the electricity bill, have less night pollution (more stars in the sky!) and reduce the speed of the cars when the road is empty (quite effective!).

Side note: since now few years, our cars are sold with front lights always active for visibility purpose (these small lights are cut only when we switching to the big ones)

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

At my previous apartment the lights outside were so bright it was unreal. Sixth floor, curtains, I could still read books at night without turning on an inside light. Can't remember the last time I saw more than a dozen stars in the sky even at my new place. Light pollution is a very present thing here

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 13 hours ago

Yes, here in Austria you are allowed to drive without headlights in bright conditions, only are required to turn them on when there is impaired visibility (night, rain, snow, fog, etc.).

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

E g. Germany

Only for motorcycles it is mandatory all day

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Bikes have lights too though?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 12 hours ago

Their visibility is quite different tho

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 10 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

That is not a requirement, you to have to have front and rear reflectors, I don't remember if side reflectors are required or not.

One thing that a lot of bikes has that is illegal here but ignored by the police, is a flashing front light.

Rear lights can absolutely be flashing, but front lights can't.

[–] aulin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The front lights are allowed to flash in Denmark and it's super annoying, and dangerous in my opinion. The lowest allowed blinking frequency is also way lower than rear lights in Sweden, so it's like being flashed by a camera repeatedly.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I still don't understand why lights even have a flashing option

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 26 points 15 hours ago

Depends on the country you live in 😂 here they are absolutely required and also are not allowed to be blinking.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They are actually required at night. https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/Trafikregler/Cyklist-mopedist-motorcyklist/Trafikregler/Regler-for-cykel/

Reflectors are also required.

And yeah the rear light are allowed to flash.

I still agree that cars are way more visible.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That is not a requirement

It is, actually: https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/trafikregler/cyklist-mopedist-motorcyklist/trafikregler/regler-for-cykel/

You're liable to pay 500 SEK if you bike without lights when it's dark outside.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

Ah, nice, I didn't know that!

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 12 hours ago

As others have said, this depends on the jurisdiction.

In the UK, you have to have lights on at night: white at the front, red at the back. They can either be steady or blinking.

[–] DV8@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

In Belgium at least they are required (reflectors aren't on all styles of bikes), problem is that cyclists often have battery powered lights which are not very bright to the point you could say they are not even working. And in my experience it really renders cyclists invisible at night until you almost run into them.

In that sense high-viz vests definitely help because they usually make them stand out more than even normal lights.

Ofcourse this is mostly needed in the places with no separate infrastructure and no street lights. (Edit: which is what the situation is in near where I live, the shortest route to bike is through farmlands with no infrastructure for bikes and no streetlight ms for sections of it. I'd personally love better and separate infrastructure since it's basically part of the reason why avoid biking there during the lang dark winter)

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Modern cars also tend to have daytime running lights that are switched on automatically when the ignition is turned on, and are meant purely for visibility.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

With modern cars, you mean cars since some time early 2000s? Actual modern cars (5 yo cars), are the only ones I see not have headlights turned on during day time.

Apparently, it's not required under EU law to have the headlights turned on during daytime, and manufactures will rather have a couple of cm longer milage...

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever law required headlights on totally backfired. Rear lights are off and people don't realize or don't care, and now they won't switch on the actual lights manually because there's an automation.

[–] aulin@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

IIRC there was only a short window when turning the rear lights off was a thing, and the law has since gone back to having to turn them on when the car is turned on. While there are still people in cars like that, they're a minority.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

And in the States cars are required to have side markers, as well.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Corner markers?

I remember that Volvo had those for a few years here, but that was in the very early 2000's I haven't seen the on normal cars for a long time.

Seems like a good idea though.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago

Side* markers. lol

They can be on the corners or not, i believe.