this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
62 points (98.4% liked)

Legal News

249 readers
317 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

SCOTUS asks US government for its view on $1 billion Sony v. Cox case.

Case file: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/11/supreme-court-may-decide-whether-isps-must-terminate-users-accused-of-piracy/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works -4 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I mean... Guns are made to kill shit... Its only function is kill or gravely mame. You're not rebuilding your house using bullets, or carving your Thanksgiving turkey with an extended magazine.

Not saying gun manufacturers should be liable, but you understand the difference between "product designed to kill quickly and effectively, end masse, used to kill" and "product designed to perform useful life function used to awkwardly, and inefficiently kill" right?... Right?

Just because you hold gun manufacturers liable for how their product is used, doesn't mean you have to hold apple orchards liable if someone grinds to thousands of apple seeds to poison someone with arsenic. We are allowed to make distinctions based on reasonable intent. You get that right?

Like, we can ban butterfly knives and switch blades but not chefs knives, because while both are just sharp angled pieces of metal, one is designed for kitchen utility and one is designed for concealment and stabbing.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 4 points 3 hours ago

Guns are also for providing food, for conservation, for recreation, for self-defense (really the only good force equalizer against a stronger attacker which is great for women, minorities and the disenfranchised), and also as a general warning against the threat of tyranny.

If we punish manufacturers for bad uses, should they be rewarded for every time someone does something positive with a gun?

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly switchblades being banned in many US states is just a moral panic thing from the 1950s and did not serve any real purpose whatsoever.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah dude found the absolute worst example to try to support his argument. Knife laws make absolutely no sense

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago

You're not rebuilding your house using bullets

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Ramset-MasterShot-0-22-Caliber-Powder-Actuated-Tool-PAT-40088/202046595

This is not a counter argument, just a funny observation.