this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
358 points (82.8% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

759 readers
683 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 34 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Tweeted by someone that voted against ranked choice voting lol

[–] invalid_name@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No. Nobody voted against ranked choice voting; it was never allowed to be an option.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, it was definitely voted down in my state

[–] invalid_name@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Oh c...well at least it got that far.

Its not like electoralism can get us out of this anyway.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It was on the ballot in well over 10% of jurisdictions, this past year. People voted it down.

[–] invalid_name@lemm.ee 1 points 42 minutes ago

Well shit. I guess electoralism is never gonna be democracy.