this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
132 points (96.5% liked)

Star Trek

1196 readers
277 users here now

/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!

Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!

~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.

~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!

~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Where is a new set of actors for TNG? If a new TNG series/movie was made, who could the actors be for that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

How come?

Because if it ain't broke don't fucking fix it.


Further, a lot of the modern films are a lot less Philosophy Trek and a lot more Action Trek. TNG as a series is squarely Philosophy Trek, even if the TNG movies veer a little too much into Action Trek themselves.

I just don't have faith that the themes would be faithfully reproduced, even if the actors, setting, and so forth could be.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Faithfully reproduced? Not an ice cube's chance in hell.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Because if it ain’t broke don’t fucking fix it.

If that were a matter of consideration for the entertainment industry there wouldn't be any live action Disney remakes.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

If we are looking at it from the cold business angle, there has to be an acknowledgement of the different audiences and the different ways that different kinds of entertainment are monetized.

A Disney movie goes into theaters to make money on its own, then it goes onto Disney+ as part of the big lineup. The main audience is children. Children don't have the kind of demand of franchises that adults do. It is much easier to get children to accept reboots.

That 2019 live action Lion King movie that nobody ever even talks about? It made a billion and a half in theaters. Why? Simple. It had animals and loud noises in it, kids don't need much more than that.

A Star Trek show is not going to be making any theater money. All the money spent on it is in the hope that it attracts enough subscribers to make the costs worth it. That's harder math and it's with a more niche and picky audience.

I was in the middle of writing up a lot of math, but the TLDR is that a TNG reboot is not as appealing as a new show. A TNG adjacent show can cash in on TNG memberberries while having the freedom to be creative to try and pull in new subscribers.