Asklemmy

43395 readers

1333 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

When it comes to "free" services/products, where do you draw the line on how your personal data/activity is used/monetized? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ComfortablyGlum@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Edited to clarify.

Things to consider: How much of your data would you be comfortable letting Lemmy sell vs Reddit? If Zuck treated users better, would you be more accepting of Meta monetizing your data every way possible? When it comes to using something for free (tangible or intangible) do you accept a company selling your personal information if their practices align with what you feel is fair?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MrSilkworm@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you are referring to corporate "free" products such as email, cloud and media consumption, I use them until I'm able not to and switch to open source. ex. Gmail -> protonmail Google Drive, photos, contacts -> Next Cloud YouTube -> Jellyfin etc. If you're referring to corporate Social Media, I just refrain from using them, except FB at the minimum due to contact with old relatives. For other Social Media consumption, I ditched Tweeter (or X or whatever) and Reddit, never used Instagram and TikTok. Switched to Federated SM like Lemmy (Duh!!!) and Mastodon.

TLDR. I value my data,but I draw the line in accordance with my ability to afford it

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does JellyFin compare to YouTube? Where is the content coming from?

[–] MrSilkworm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

jellyfin goes arrrrrr

[–] Underpay@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jellyfin is more like a self hosted streaming service for movies and shows. It can only watch content you provide yourself on your server, with that content coming from fully legal sources.

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

So it’s akin to Plex.

The comparison the comment I replied to makes no sense then.

YouTube -> JellyFin is like comparing Amazon to owning an empty warehouse.

[–] ComfortablyGlum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So do you feel that companies should never sell/use a person's info even if the product is free? Would you accept greater amounts of advertising and the use of anonamized user data if it meant your personal info was never sold?

[–] MrSilkworm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Our societies have a tendancy to be more authoritarian, autocratic and consumption driven. The way the corporations are using anyone's data is not transparent and there is no accountability for it. There is also no monetary reward for the use of my data.

Therefore, I prefer to use open source apps and federated SM.

So to answer your question, I would like transparency and accountability about my data usage, as well as compensation. And no I would not like more ads. Since I realise that my preferences are impossible, I try to make the switch I referred above