this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
327 points (96.8% liked)

World News

32324 readers
808 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah! As long as you don't read the Montevideo Convention or ask any international legal scholars, your conception of international law is totally correct!

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That has nothing to do with being a state, it's about south American former colonies gaining recognition from European powers.

"They agreed among themselves to criteria that made it easier for other dependent states with limited sovereignty to gain international recognition. "

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a restatement of customary international law, the Montevideo Convention merely codified existing legal norms and its principles and therefore does not apply merely to the signatories, but to all subjects of international law as a whole.

It has nothing to do with being a state, except for being a restatement and codification of the internationally recognized state practice and opinio juris about what constitutes a state.

Maybe actually read the whole Wikipedia article you're quoting from instead of just skimming the first few paragraphs.