this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
464 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37551 readers
319 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While Jitsi is open-source, most people use the platform they provide, meet.jit.si, for immediate conference calls. They have now introduced a "Know Your Customer" policy and require at least one of the attendees to log in with a Facebook, Github (Microsoft), or Google account.

One option to avoid this is to self-host, but then you'll be identifiable via your domain and have to maintain a server.

As a true alternative to Jitsi, there's jami.net. It is a decentralized conference app, free open-source, and account creation is optional. It's available for all major platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), including on F-Droid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kev@lemmy.kevhomeit.trade 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh hell no. Why they dont make it optional?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People were doing illegal stuffs on it

[–] Peruvian_Skies@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Possibly stupid question: if they found out that people were doing illegal stuff on it, doesn't that mean that they were monitoring people's conferences? I thought that the FOSS community was big on privacy.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

I imagine they're receiving reports from other parties, such as law enforcement, that there are inappropriate things happening, rather than monitoring the streams themselves.

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, because we don't know how they got the information. Someone might as well just have reported it, or it was forwarded from law enforcement.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Théry are plenty of FOSS people who don't believe in privacy. Just because you like openness in one thing doesn't mean you want it in another. Though there is probably a larger overlap.

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I get what you are saying, but the Venn diagram is basically overlapping circles. Yes, they are not exactly the same thing, but you would be hard-pressed to find somebody who advocates for/regularly uses open-source software yet isn’t as passionate about privacy. It is reasonable to assume one who advocates for one is also advocating for the other. 

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's just not true at all. You're talking from a very small circle if you think most OSS is used by privacy buffs. The largest users of OSS are companies, followed by techies who enjoy the challenge or the ownership. Privacy wonks are by far the smallest userbase.

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I did not say people who use it. I said people who advocate for and regularly use OSS. Plenty of people use open source software because it is the most popular or it is what was recommended to them. Obviously that group exists in large number.

[–] kev@lemmy.kevhomeit.trade 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] unreachable@lemmy.my.id 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

starting video chat with one self, with nobody else involved