this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
27 points (90.9% liked)

SpaceX

2047 readers
30 users here now

A community for discussing SpaceX.

Related space communities:

Memes:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
few@sh.itjust.works
27
Falcon 9 reaches a flight rate 30 times higher than shuttle at 1/100th the cost (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 months ago by llamacoffee@lemmy.world to c/spacex@sh.itjust.works
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The asymmetric design terrifies me. Fuel tank on the side? Absolutely bonkers. And yet it totally worked.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fuel tank on the side? Absolutely bonkers.

And not just on the side, but the heatshield side. In retrospect, it's possible that designing it so the heat shield faced outward (further from any falling insulation) might have been safer.

And yet it totally worked.

Well, it mostly worked. 133/135 ain't bad, but statistics hit different for crewed vehicles.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

My understanding is that the payload bay had to be accessible while stacking, so tank on the other side wouldn't work.