this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
227 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

60016 readers
2616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Use Signal or XMPP+OMEMO or anything else.

Mandate social media to expose an open API and use the chat function with an OTR plugin.

The solutions are all old.

It's just interesting how it all went from promotion of corporate surveillance to comms protection when supposed corporate shills won the election.

[–] asudox@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It would be great if XMPP were to rise again.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It went out of popularity for a reason. I'd love a new protocol with XMPP's mistakes fixed.

BTW, OMEMO highlights one of those - it's not as good as Signal by which it is inspired. Basically no metadata protection, which means that it's as good as OTR with multiple devices.

Some kind of Signal with federation (and good clients, not like signal-desktop) would be interesting. Maybe even p2p with some kind of relays (like in NOSTR) for history, offline messages, some kind of Telegram channels and such.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Look into Session. I didn't like it but it checks your boxes

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol no. I like being able to send messages to someone who isn't online at the same time

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting xmpp can't do that? XD

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. Asynchronous communication is dependent on both users servers software and config. And that's exactly why XMPP is disused.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure there's an option you can disable in server software to disable message storage. Why stop at this?

XMPP can't federate because there's an option for disabling that too! 😧

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Its the other way around. Asynchronous communication was a feature added later in some software. By default it didn't have it

I'm saying it'd a deal breaker if all users dont have asynchronous communication.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

You're technically correct but that was two decades ago. Novadays virtually every featured server passes the Conversations compliance test which continuously checks if all modern features are enabled.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do you suggest OTR? It's outdated, modern XMPP clients moved to OMEMO for a reason.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It's not outdated, it's just differently intended. OTR you can use over any IM allowing custom clients. OMEMO requires support in the protocol.

OTR is better than inline PGP for that purpose, because of temporary keys.

So if you have a legislation mandating that a certain IM network or social platform supports open API for custom clients, you can use OTR over it, you can use inline PGP over it, but you can't use OMEMO over it.

[–] foxitixation@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago