this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22341 readers
118 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Juice@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Swap Marx and Engels, because the meme would hit harder, but also the constitution of Stalin's formulations of Dialectical Materialism, as well as other philosophic formulations in Foundations of Leninism is adapted from Anti-Duhring, so arguably Engels is more prominent in ML canon than Marx, assuming the canon features Stalin more prominently than Marx, Engels or Lenin.

[–] Bobson_Dugnutt@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I just personally like Engels' writing style shrug-outta-hecks He's better than Marx at getting to the point of what he's trying to say

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Karl "this convoluted 19th century paragraph argument is going somewhere bro, trust me bro" Marx

[–] Juice@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I also love reading Engels, and Anti-Duhring is every bit as important of a theoretical basis as a work like Capital. Capital achieves in practical analysis what Anti-Duhring achieves in theoretical analysis.

Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 I think is Marx at his most digestible although he's much hazier on the mechanics of capitalist appropriation than in later works. Thesis on Feuerbach is a work of Marx's that is extremely concise and IMO understudied and poorly understood if not outright ignored. In a few hundred words Marx thoroughly obliterates any notion that he never considered "human nature" in his analysis, on the contrary his entire analysis begins with and stays permanently grounded in his deep love and optimism and hope for the spirit of humanity and our development; our immense potential for self actualization through revolutionary socialist cooperation.

There's just so much that can be learned from Marx specifically, and even if his later work is complicated, it can be understood best when you work with a group to understand it. It isn't something for the individual to master, it is for us all to free ourselves. But Engels in his own right, as difficult as it is to separate them, is a fantastic writer and theoretician.