this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5383 readers
156 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
15
Montana Supreme Court affirms decision in Held, historic youth climate case | Limit on analysis of greenhouse gas emissions unconstitutional, court says (dailymontanan.com)
submitted 4 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] DougHolland@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's no fun being Douggy Downer or Mr Pessimism, and this actually is a major victory and my congrats, sincerely, to those who fought and won ... and yet what is the victory exactly? One American state will not be allowed to forbid the study of climate change.

We are dying here, literally, and this is a major victory, but it's damned near nada and we're still dying here.

[โ€“] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 4 days ago

We are dying here, literally, and this is a major victory, but it's damned near nada and we're still dying here.

We're not dying, though. We're still alive. We might be heading towards climate disaster, but we aren't there yet, and the future isn't a forgone conclusion; don't give into the idea that we're already dead and just don't know it. If Montana ends up being the one safe haven for climate study (and it probably won't be alone), I'll take that over whatever cockamamie "plans" the next admin has.

As long as science can keep happening in relative safety, we have hope of progress.