this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
248 points (90.0% liked)
Linux
5502 readers
185 users here now
A community for everything relating to the linux operating system
Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Dealing with Linux for 2 decades doesn't make you and expert in modern Linux. It just makes you old.
Even leaving Linux for a few years means that you get behind. I had to explain to a coworker what Wayland was because he hasn't used Linux in years.
If WSL works for you that's great but here are the issues I've had
weird networking issues where Windows can access Linux but Linux can not access Windows without lots of work.
any advanced networking like VPN's will not work
It is slow and requires working virtualization
Filesystem sharing is not as easy as I would like
It is a bit finicky to get working and requires a bunch of disk space and resources.
Meanwhile native Linux doesn't have these issues and git bash/cygwin is almost native in the sense that it has little overhead. Architectural perspective Cygwin is a lot like Wine. It just translates Linux calls to Windows ones.
If you need Windows I would run it in a VM under Linux as that's going to be a much better experience.
You don't have to know what Wayland is, it isn't necessary in the least.
locks front door
Without doxxing myself, I promise you I know more about linux than you do and I'm not saying windows is better, you silly fuck, I am saying it's more stable. I don't even recommend using either as a server when BSD is better at stability than both OS combined.
Linus, is that you?
No, just a random internet idiot.