Politics

373 readers

374 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

Congressional lawmakers almost got a pay bump this year. Then it crashed and burned (www.npr.org)

submitted 1 week ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Congressional pay for rank-and-file members is $174,000 and hasn't been adjusted since 2009.

A recent change allows members to claim reimbursement for some lodging expenses, aimed at helping those struggling to maintain two residences.

"It changes the makeup a lot," the Wisconsin Republican said in an interview. "We have a real disincentive for people to run for Congress unless you're a fairly affluent person. People think that $174,000 is a lot of money — and if you're making $50 to $60,000, it appears that way. But having that separate place to live and providing utilities in a very expensive city, you burn through that money pretty quickly."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I lived in a very comfortable and cozy officer barracks at Camp Humphrey in South Korea. About 400sqft. Had a living room, bedroom, full bathroom, full kitchen, and I lived by myself. The building housed a couple hundred people, all in single occupancy. I don't see why any congressperson needs anything more than that when they shouldn't be staying there 3/4 of their term.

There are a couple military installations around the DC area if you're worried about securing a bunch of politicians in a single area instead of dispersed. Maybe living on post they will realize how terrible some junior enlisted barracks are and actually spend some defense money on the service members that need it the most.

I'd rather the government give them a place to stay at tax payer expense than give them more than the minimum wage of the state they represent.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, a congressional hotel or apartment building is probably the way to go, although the flip side of that is that it further insulates members of Congress from 'normal' life.