this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
1136 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
4763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Suck it micro USB, mini USB, and lightning! 🪫🔋

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Walican132 111 points 2 months ago (114 children)

My only concern with this law, is that what happens when USBC is no longer the best option. Idk how to express what I’m saying but what if USB-G ends up being 1000x as fast. Does this law allow for chargers to evolve and if so, how? I admit I haven’t looked into this but I’ve been wondering about it.

I’m 99% wireless these days so I wouldn’t be surprised if chorded chargers are largely on their way out, but I’m still curious.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

USB-C isn't the best option at all because USB c isn't USB c. It only standardises the port and connector but there are many different connectors.

https://hackaday.com/2022/12/06/usb-c-introduction-for-hackers/

[–] Walican132 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the article, cool read!

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

It's crazy, isn't it? But it's not a single article... I think there are ten more.

https://hackaday.com/series_of_posts/all-about-usb-c/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (111 replies)