this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
151 points (79.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43944 readers
487 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Of a sort.
I strongly believe that the universe we are in is one created and run by an intelligent 3rd party.
But unlike 99.9% of the people who share that belief, I happen to also believe that this 3rd party was itself created from evolutionary processes in a world that was not created.
It's a belief that seems to go back at least to the 3rd century CE, but centers around the notion that a chaotic universe where life evolved without design (an idea at least as old as Leucretius in 50 BCE) would eventually create life sophisticated enough to be able to create worlds itself, and that we are in the re-creation of such a universe at an earlier point in time.
One of the wildest aspects of that belief in antiquity was its focus on the notions of Greek atomism and matter being made up of indivisible parts as an indicator of its claim of being in a copy of a higher fidelity original. Especially given that a central component of my own belief in this topic relates to the similarity between quantum behaviors (indivisible parts of matter) and hacks we have started using in building procedurally generated voxel based virtual worlds.
Why is this being downvoted? It's just a theory and they aren't saying y'all are going to burn for eternity if you don't agree.
It's the kind of thinking that upsets theists by presenting an answer that is deeply at odds with a belief in supernatural origins of existence, and that upsets atheists self-assured in their disbelief of any possible creator.
When a discussion is broadly divided into two camps, claiming both are wrong isn't destined to win popularity contests.
Love that stuff. Please never let your curiosity and mind be pulled down by edgy atheists.
My favourite that kinda falls in that category is that a "designed world / controlled universe" failed; was about to be completely destroyed. they realized it soon enough, so they encoded...encrypted ALL their knowledge into different media (dna, quantum stuff, etc. and idk) then put that into meteorites etc. and catapulted it out in all directions of the great nothingness, in the hopes that at some point it will land somewhere where it can cause a chain reaction (evolution) that will lead to a being, that is capable to restore the encoded knowledge.