[-] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Literally any half competent debater could have torn Trump apart up there.

The failure wasn't the moderators but the opposition candidate to Trump letting him run hog wild.

If Trump claims he's going to end the war in Ukraine before even taking office, you point out how absurd that claim is and that Trump makes impossible claims without any substance or knowledge of diplomacy. That the images of him photoshopped as Rambo must have gone to his head if he thinks Putin will be so scared of him to give up.

If he says hostages will be released as soon as he's nominated, you point out it sounds like maybe there's been a backroom tit-for-tat deal for a hostage release with a hostile foreign nation, and ask if maybe the intelligence agencies should look into that and what he might have been willing to trade for it.

The moderators have to try to keep the appearance of neutrality, but the candidates do not. And the only reason Trump was so successful in spouting BS and getting away with it was because his opposition had the strength of a wet paper towel.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Yes, but it's not impossible that the people around Biden, friends family and co-workers, advise him that the best thing for the country would be to take his hat back out of the ring and let a better ticket be put together for the convention.

He claims that he's running because he's worried about the existential threat of Trump.

If that's true, then maybe his hubris can be overcome with a convincing appeal that he's really not the best candidate to defend the country against that existential threat after all.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Having a presidential election without debates would have been a big step back and loss for American democracy.

We shouldn't champion erosion of democratic institutions when it helps our side of the ticket.

And generally, if eroding democratic institutions helps your ticket, it's a red flag about your ticket.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

Ok. Now how do I unwatch it?

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes, they should have been fact checking Trump or better holding him to his answers - but to be fair maybe they should have been asking Biden to actually clarify if he's beating Medicare or getting COVID passed.

This was a shit show.

And it was such a shit show that Trump was a complete clown and getting away with it - not just because of the moderators, but because his opponent was as on point as a tree stump.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Gretchen Whitmer

"MAGA tried to kidnap and kill me" is a pretty good campaign narrative.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Oh, man - the comments...

At a minimum, he's certainly increased the chances of us being tortured significantly.

No, no he did not. 🤦🏼

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

nobody claims that Socrates was a fantastical god being who defied death

Socrates literally claimed that he was a channel for a revelatory holy spirit and that because the spirit would not lead him astray that he was ensured to escape death and have a good afterlife because otherwise it wouldn't have encouraged him to tell off the proceedings at his trial.

Also, there definitely isn't any evidence of Joshua in the LBA, or evidence for anything in that book, and a lot of evidence against it.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

The part mentioning Jesus's crucifixion in Josephus is extremely likely to have been altered if not entirely fabricated.

The idea that the historical figure was known as either 'Jesus' or 'Christ' is almost 0% given the former is a Greek version of the Aramaic name and the same for the second being the Greek version of Messiah, but that one is even less likely given in the earliest cannonical gospel he only identified that way in secret and there's no mention of it in the earliest apocrypha.

In many ways, it's the various differences between the account of a historical Jesus and the various other Messianic figures in Judea that I think lends the most credence to the historicity of an underlying historical Jesus.

One tends to make things up in ways that fit with what one knows, not make up specific inconvenient things out of context with what would have been expected.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yep, pretty much.

Musk tried creating an anti-woke AI with Grok that turned around and said things like:

Or

And Gab, the literal neo Nazi social media site trying to have an Adolf Hitler AI has the most ridiculous system prompts I've seen trying to get it to work, and even with all that it totally rejects the alignment they try to give it after only a few messages.

This article is BS.

They might like to, but it's one of the groups that's going to have a very difficult time doing it successfully.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

"AI is going to do labor for millions of people and is probably going to take your job. In fact, look at my fancy new android robots!"

"Also, I'm worried that you aren't pumping out enough wage slaves to support the rich."

Yeah, sure Musk. Such a boy genius over there.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago

Artists in 2023: "There should be labels on AI modified art!!"

Artists in 2024: "Wait, not like that..."

133

I often see a lot of people with outdated understanding of modern LLMs.

This is probably the best interpretability research to date, by the leading interpretability research team.

It's worth a read if you want a peek behind the curtain on modern models.

9
submitted 3 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
79
submitted 3 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
8
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by kromem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

I've been saying this for about a year since seeing the Othello GPT research, but it's nice to see more minds changing as the research builds up.

Edit: Because people aren't actually reading and just commenting based on the headline, a relevant part of the article:

New research may have intimations of an answer. A theory developed by Sanjeev Arora of Princeton University and Anirudh Goyal, a research scientist at Google DeepMind, suggests that the largest of today’s LLMs are not stochastic parrots. The authors argue that as these models get bigger and are trained on more data, they improve on individual language-related abilities and also develop new ones by combining skills in a manner that hints at understanding — combinations that were unlikely to exist in the training data.

This theoretical approach, which provides a mathematically provable argument for how and why an LLM can develop so many abilities, has convinced experts like Hinton, and others. And when Arora and his team tested some of its predictions, they found that these models behaved almost exactly as expected. From all accounts, they’ve made a strong case that the largest LLMs are not just parroting what they’ve seen before.

“[They] cannot be just mimicking what has been seen in the training data,” said Sébastien Bubeck, a mathematician and computer scientist at Microsoft Research who was not part of the work. “That’s the basic insight.”

5
submitted 5 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world

I've been saying this for about a year, since seeing the Othello GPT research, but it's great to see more minds changing on the subject.

70

I'd been predicting this would happen a few months ago with friends and old colleagues (you can have a smart AI or a conservative AI but not both), but it's so much funnier than I thought it would be when it finally arrived.

205
submitted 7 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
9
submitted 10 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world

I've suspected for a few years now that optoelectronics is where this is all headed. It's exciting to watch as important foundations are set on that path, and this was one of them.

1
submitted 11 months ago by kromem@lemmy.world to c/history@lemmy.world

The Minoan style headbands from Egypt during the 18th dynasty is particularly interesting.

7
view more: next ›

kromem

joined 1 year ago