this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
11 points (92.3% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2434 readers
57 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why is there no country where you have more terminating-road-priority intersections as opposed to continuing-road-priority intersections?

Example of terminating road priority: Road A terminates at an intersection with Road B. Road B has to yield to vehicles turning onto Road B (especially cross-lane turns)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

2 main reasons:

  1. Continuing roads have higher traffic and therefore higher priority

  2. Engineers want traffic to stop as little as possible. Take a "T" intersection, the cross (-) does not have to stop, but for the stem (I) to change directions they will want to snow down, so making them stop is easy

[–] thefreepenguinalt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is it not better to have shorter stops as opposed to longer stops? Usually the terminating road would not have any cars on it, so the continuing road would run as usual, but in the event that the terminating road does have a car, it should be able to safely access the continuing road without stopping

[–] StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What you're suggesting would require a stop light + sensors to be done safely. That costs much more than just putting up a stop sign on the road that is normally empty.

[–] thefreepenguinalt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago

What would happen if a yield sign were put on a 2-lane continuing road (1 lane per direction)

load more comments (1 replies)