this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
226 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

60332 readers
3676 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sxan@midwest.social 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also, the DRM baked into the specification is such bullshit.

That's the one thing they have absolutely no interest in getting rid of. They'll change everything about the spec, including the connector, but that part's staying in.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's why I added it as an addendum. Even sourcing HDMI cables without HDCP is getting very very rare.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

TBF, I will say I've never been hit by HDCP. I'm not sure I'd recognize it. Then again, I don't try to copy video from over a display cable; it just seems like adding an unnecessary middleman. But I oppose it in principle.

Edit: "born" -> "hit". WTF

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

HDCP and media production are often at odds with each other. It is broad overreach of content protection. It is super frustrating.