this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
246 points (88.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12666 readers
883 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

Not the hotdogs!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And none of them back those claims up. Or actually attack the credibility of the story.

Now then, are you here to defend Kim Jong Un too?

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And none of them back those claims up.

"those claims" meaning that RFA is linked to US intelligence/politics?

Are you saying RFA isn't a branch of US interests? I have never heard anyone make that claim before.

See 1st paragraph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Agency_for_Global_Media

38north.org is a pretty decent source on North Korean news.

Or actually attack the credibility of the story.

You have the burden of proof backwards: WHY would anyone believe that "hot dogs are banned in North Korea". It simply makes no sense. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

There's no reason to think the story is credible. I've searched it and it appears RFA posted it in November, then The Sun picked it up 3 days ago. Then various repeaters.