this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22931 readers
207 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Obviously there are the climate change denialists who think “global elites” have paid actors setting forest fires around the globe, but there are also reputable people saying this. When I hear arson, I hear a person starting a fire with malicious intent. Are there really massive numbers of malicious firestarters around the globe, or does arson also cover things like recklessness/carelessness, like if I burn trash in my backyard or start a campfire on the woods and it gets out of control?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cammy@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's arson, not climate change

[–] rootsbreadandmakka@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It’s absolutely a muddying of the waters. But I’d like to be exacting in my criticism of those people. Since I can see a situation in which climate change creates the conditions (drier, hotter, drought, more wind etc) that cause human-started fires to grow larger and out of control. When folks start to talk about “arson” in relation to wildfires, is there any truth to it and I just have too narrow a definition of arson, or is it purely just a muddying of the waters?

[–] Lawn_and_disorder@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean arson in my motherthounge is murder fire.

Lighting a match does not say what the consequences will be