this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
1446 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

5487 readers
1756 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1446
Twitter's filters for anybody out of the loop (slrpnk.net)
submitted 3 days ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
280 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Normally I agree with your opinions, but you are just striking out left and right in this particular thread.
How I prove it is your problem, in fact it is only your problem. You are the only one asking me for "proof", and I made a good faith attempt to do that, but you aren't happy with that, so it is up to you to define what you want as proof. Unless of course you never wanted proof in the first place?
Oh, and don't forget to specify the quantities of proof that you will need as your minimum sample size, because apparently you need to be proven wrong a specific number of times to accept that you are wrong.
Or better yet, you made your own claim, show me your detailed and irrefutable proof and I will concede that you are correct and I was wrong. And I know you feel that a sample size of 1 is meaningless, but you seem like a man of your word, misguided, but still a man of your word, so I will accept as few as 4 proofs.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Is this really how you two want to spend your time? Be excellent to each other. This really isn't removal worthy, but you both might need a break.