this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
9 points (84.6% liked)

NZ Politics

572 readers
7 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This legislation is all about forcing a U.S. centric foreign policy on New Zealand, making it illegal to sympathise with anything other than the BBC or CNN official narrative. They will start harassing people at the airports and it will continue to get worse. Support for Palestine and Donbass are the targets here, but in the future SIS will go full McCarthyism over China. Once the government bans foreign media outlets, the next logical step is to ban anyone who operates independently as a journalist or activist, then the only views you will hear will be Israeli, Ukrainian or Taiwanese. Free speech, but only if you support the U.S. narrative. I look forward to battling SIS and defending free speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 14 hours ago

This offence criminalises the act of “foreign interference”. To commit the offence, a person must be doing an activity for a foreign state, and the person’s actions must include all three of the following key elements – they:

know, or ought to know, they are acting for a foreign state, and
act in a covert, deceptive, coercive, or corruptive manner, and
intend to, or be aware that they are likely to, harm New Zealand interests specified in the offence through their actions.

This doesn't really back up the claims you make in the body text, and this is the source you've provided to back yourself up.

First, factual reporting isn't acting for a foreign state, unless they're paying you a salary.

Second, there isn't anything deceptive about reading, writing or sharing news articles.

Third, I struggle to see how this would harm NZ interests.

This is all very tinfoil hat, in my view.