this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
111 points (94.4% liked)

Slop.

322 readers
547 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Link, text of the article below with me highlighting the only important bit.

NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - The Central Intelligence Agency has assessed that the COVID-19 pandemic is "more likely" to have emerged from a lab rather than from nature, an agency spokesperson said on Saturday.

The agency had for years said it could not conclude whether COVID-19 was the result of a lab incident or it originated in nature. But in the final weeks of the Biden administration, former CIA Director William Burns asked CIA analysts and scientists to make a clear determination, stressing the pandemic's historical significance, according to a senior U.S. official.

The CIA says it has "low confidence" in its assessment that a "research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely" and notes in its statement that both scenarios - lab origin and natural origin - remain plausible.

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear the extent to which the agency has collected new intelligence on COVID-19's origins and whether that new evidence was used to formulate the latest assessment.

China’s government says it supports and has taken part in research to determine COVID-19’s origin, and has accused Washington of politicizing the matter, especially because of efforts by U.S. intelligence agencies to investigate.

Beijing has said claims that a laboratory leak likely caused the pandemic have no credibility. In an interview with Breitbart following his confirmation by the U.S. Senate on Friday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said one of his first priorities was getting his agency to make a public assessment on the pandemic's origins.

“That’s a day-one thing for me," he said. "I’ve been on record as you know in saying I think our intelligence, our science, and our common sense all really dictate that the origins of COVID was a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 36 points 2 days ago (9 children)

For your sanity and mine, assume a natural origin for covid.

Now, for those who don't remember or missed it,

Reguardless of natural or man-made, COVID did not originate in Wuhan, China!

A hospital in Italy went and looked at frozen lung samples from autumn of 2019, and found COVID-19 antibodies in them. Summer of 2019, the US was experiencing a wave of unidentified respiratory illnesses across elder car facilities, as well as a "vape related illness". This. Thing. Did. NOT. Start. In. China. They were just the first to isolate, identify, and confirm the virus!

[–] baaaaaaaaaaah@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I feel like China would be pushing this if this was the case, no?

I understand that the theory floated around Chinese media in the early days of the pandemic but I've not seen anything recently.

[–] tellmeaboutit@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 days ago

It would also be easy to identify in the sequencing data because mutations happen at a contestant and predictable rate. That makes it easy to trace the lineage of a virus. Given that every strain we know of originated from the initial sequences isolated in Wuhan, the idea that the pandemic started elsewhere is just nonsense.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)