this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
1153 points (99.1% liked)
memes
11276 readers
3009 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That analogy is flawed to the point I'd say it's completely incorrect. To try and save it, I would go with ...
A Chinese company has released a free car into a market full of free cars, but their car is the 2025 model so everyone wants it as its new. It won't be new for long, and everyone will want a different model soon.
Nvidia targets businesses with their products, consumers having free cars isn't a big issue for them as companies will still need their trucks.
Nvidia stockholders think the sky is falling and are pulling out, causing them to think the sky is falling, causing them to pull out. The real threat here isn't DeepSeek, it's that stockholders start to see AI doesn't actually offer all the benefits that have been promised to companies looking to cut cost.
Edit: Oh and nobody is running the actual real 720GB, Deepseek R 671b model that can beat GPT, without using very high end expensive Nvidia cards. The stuff people are running on their machines at home is like a go-kart compared to the car.
Eh, analogy will be imperfect due to nuance, but I'd say it is close.
The big deals are:
I also think this is on the back of a fairly long relatively stagnant run. After the folks saw the leap from GPT2 to ChatGPT they assumed a future of similar dramatic leaps, but have instead gotten increasingly modest refinements. So against a backdrop of a more "meh" sentiment over where they are going you have this thing to disturb some presumed fundamentals in the popular opinion.