this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
178 points (96.8% liked)

Bicycles

3097 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just look at the speed that the RV was going! The driver was given a $500 ticket for almost killing 30 cyclists. Insane that they're even allowed to drive after that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Strangle@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. It shows that there is precedent for suspended licenses when there is a collision.

You make it seem like they can't take away your license for unsafe driving, for some fucked reason.

Your arguments aren't holding up.

[–] Strangle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course it matters. Driving drunk is not the same as driving stone cold sober.

How could you think they are at all comparable?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, the US has laws about unsafe driving. Not all unsafe driving is when drunk.

But losing your license is normal for unsafe drivers.

I don't know what you are arguing at this point.

[–] Strangle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This didn’t look like unsafe driving to me

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fact that they were close to the cyclists that they hit them in an area that has a minimum distance law kinda disproves your argument.

Also you don't have one on whether the licence being revoked as governments retain the ability to take your driving privileges.

So what are you actually arguing, because you see to be in a rut.