this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
411 points (94.2% liked)

Games

32663 readers
754 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For those who have pre-ordered it is already here, the rest have to wait a little longer. Starfield is finally here! Have you bought it, why or why not? If you've already played it, what do you think of it? We are very curious!

Discuss all things Starfield below!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It also is new, it used the creation engine 2.

It would be like arguing that UE5 isn’t new just because it’s an upgraded UE4.

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

UE5 doesn't still have UE2 limitations. Gamebryo still won't let me climb ladders. It's clear that UE has been upgraded extensively, while Gamebryo has not.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The one thing Unreal still has bug wise is the fact I can't place hundreds of actors in a blueprints viewport because it lags like Satan but if I run code that spawns the same amount attached to said actor or drag the same quantity into the level itself it works without issue.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every engine has its own different limitations.

Not everyone cares about climbing ladders so it may not be something they feel is worth the effort to add to their engine.

To say it hasn’t been updated extensively is frankly insulting and is also fundamentally wrong.

[–] tal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One thing I did want in Fallout 4 that I don't believe it presently does is dynamic generation of polygons in curves.

The game has environments with kinda curvy surfaces, but aside from the dynamic level of detail models, the engine can't go throw spare horsepower at generating more polygons to make smoother curves. I think that that's a good match with long-lived PC games, because people playing it years later on more-powerful hardware can burn their extra cycles on making things pretty.

It's not vital or anything, just think that if there's one game where it'd be neat, it'd be Bethesda-type games.