179
In America, the rich controls the government. In China, the government controls the rich.
(lemmy.ml)
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
179 points (86.5% liked)
Memes
47095 readers
1422 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
tbh you can't exile people anymore and getting staggering rich requires sustained campaigns of oppressive violence and exploitation.
It's self defence, you're talking about people that have demonstrated a complete lack of empathy and a complete lack of wanting to use their resources to rectify that or limit the harms they can do.
These aren't like people with FAS trying to do anger management courses because their brains got damaged. They're unrepentant, remorseless, and cruel. They had the resources to do literally anything to demonstrate contrition and chose not to every single day.
It's definitionally not self-defense to kill someone who's already in handcuffs. I don't care if they are straight up evil, no living being deserves to be murdered once they present no actual danger.
If you have a way to rehabilitate them don't hold back.
That's kinda irrelevant to murdering someone. But yeah, if you make your prisons places that fix people rather than places for punishment (provide prisoners the ability to learn actually useful skills and put them to use, and offer therapy) I think that even some of the worst parasites, murderers, etc can eventually become useful members of society (see the Scandinavian prison model for how this can be applied quite successfully).
Scandanavia doesn't rehab billionaires lmao.
Yeah sure, Scandinavian countries are capitalist and thus billionaires are treated as demigods. We still observe that their prison system has better outcomes for everyone involved (convicts & society) compared to US/Chinese system of "prisons as punishment only" and learn from it.
I'm not getting into this. The rich willfully demonstrate every single day they are more intentionally anti-social than the most psychotic serial killers. They are pure aberrations, utterly remorseless, completely without empathy. They happily commit mass murder with the wave of a pen again and again, they are engaged in active omnicide. Literally they are actively killing entire ecosystems to avoid a life of staggering luxury vs a life of unimaginable luxury.
Nobody has ever demonstrated an effective treatment for such a disordered mind.
How many times have we tried? It's 0. AES countries throw them in (somewhat) brutal prisons or execute them, and capitalist countries with rehab-oriented prisons don't consider parasitism a crime (which of course it is).
The same has been said many times about murderers and rapists in the past (and, by some people, in the present too) - and yet look at rates of recidivism in Scandinavia. 80% or more of violent criminals become productive members of society after being released.
Are parasites worse? Sometimes. I've had the displeasure of talking to a person worth ~$1B (it was Evgeniy Kaspersky for reference). They just didn't want to think about all the suffering they are causing, instead saying shit like "I worked hard for this, if other people worked as hard they'd be as rich". Just like most people don't want to think where their chicken nuggets come from and how they are produced. I don't think they lack empathy, they're just trying their best to avoid feeling it towards people they're exploiting.
AES countries need to push the envelope of humanity, not be stuck in brutal 17th century ways. Try to teach everyone empathy and understanding, give everyone a second chance, the worst that could happen with a parasite is that they try this shit again after being released and go back to prison, with their wealth confiscated for public good once again.
It's absolutely not 0, people constantly try non violent means of renegotiating social relations and get nowhere, in fact they usually get executed for the trouble. Revolutions have left people alive and they consistently side with counterrevolutionary forces and violently crush anyone attempting to improve equality.
I mean french revolution says hello? The worst that can happen is they scuttle off, rouse reactionary forces, and violently oppress billions again. Which they have consistently done no matter how attractive the proposed alternatives have been.
Also people who aren't vegan and have encountered the idea also suck, so that isn't exactly making your point.
Imprisonment and confiscations is definitionally violent; I'm not advocating for a non-violent solution to a problem which is perpetuated by violence.
Remember that I'm not talking about peaceful protests. I'm talking about isolating the parasites, trying to turn them into humans and giving them a second chance if we're reasonably certain they're not a threat anymore.
Prisons are places where people are placed to stop them from causing further harm. Hard to help reactionary forces when you're isolated from society.
The hope is that during that isolation it's possible to change their ways.
As far as I can tell, this has never been tried by anyone.
The french revolution was orchestrated by the bourgeoisie. The then-billionaires never "scuttled off", they were literally half the Assembly. And that revolution also executed most of the old elites, the old order never really came back but was replaced with an imperialist order practically brought about by the Assembly/Convention themselves, so I'm not sure what point you're making here.
This is like a good 80% of the population nowadays. Do we execute all of them? No, we try to make them understand the consequences of their lifestyle, and teach them empathy for all living things. That's my point.
Non vegans at least have the excuse of being deeply indoctrinated, and having 90+ percent of people reenforcing and defending their behaviour. The ultra rich dont.
Was talking about the Paris commune in particular, the national assembly is an example of where rich people fall. Rather than share bread they'll install fascist military dictatorships.
Keeping people in a cage is crueler and riskier than just killing them. If anyone voluntarily gives up their wealth and power I'm all for forgiveness, I've never seen it happen but even serial killers have voluntarily turned themselves in and sought help.
I don't think you quite grasp just how far gone the rich are.
In a way, they have been indoctrinated by capitalism, and are reinforcing that indoctrination by being the capitalists. I can totally believe that most rich people consider themselves "good people" because they have "succeeded" in the capitalist system.
That's debatable by itself. But I'm not talking about keeping people in a cage. I'm talking about trying to forcefully re-educate them and re-integrate them into the society. If they refuse or fail then that's on them. Even keeping someone in (a humane) prison for life is still less cruel then murdering them IMHO. This is demonstrated by the fact that most death row inmates fight their conviction up until the last moment, even though their living conditions there are awful. People who volunteer to be killed usually have severe mental issues, thus it's closer to suicide then an informed decision.
As I've said, I've met and talked with one of them. They're not all innately awful evil people (I don't think there are any people who are born evil), merely shaped to be such by their situation. And therefore, a lot of them could be turned into productive members of society with enough re-education, therapy, and honest work.