this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
200 points (89.7% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7688 readers
3 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If so, was it polled somewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bzz@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The quote was to establish that the admins personal feelings are involved about the instance.

It is an objective fact that the sub was banned on Reddit for hate speech. The rolling eyes emoji establishes the admins personal feelings on the subject.

Whether the ban is justified or not is irrelevant to my point that SJW does not care to understand what its user base may want.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

objective fact

It's an "objective fact" that support for John Brown's history of fighting slavery and slavers is hate speech?

Way to drop that mask.

[–] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Slavers do (and did) deserve to die though, it's not hate speech it's just true

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

kill all slavers. every last one.

Whether or not the eye roll is justified is in question when the quote is supposed to emblematic of the admin’s opinions of the instance. Some of our staunchest detractors can admin that “kill slave owners” is not hate speech because “slave owner” is not a protected class. Do you think dismissal of this logic is so outlandish that it must be emblematic of support for our instance? Because I don’t see any other reason to include it.