In this scenario, the Big Four (Deloitte, EY, KPMG, and PwC) went bankrupt because major companies had accounting scandals. But the Big Four were also directly and indirectly involved, so their licenses were suspended and they could not accept new clients because of the scandal.
But the scandal is causing Big Four (Deloitte, EY, KPMG, and PwC) customers to leave for fear that it will also affect them. The Big Four's finances are in jeopardy and they are declaring bankruptcy to prevent the problem from getting worse.
I would like to know what economic consequences this event could cause, and if this event could be comparable to the crisis of 2008, 1929 or more serious than the two mentioned above.
This isn’t my area of expertise, but this sounds like confusing cause for effect. I think these companies dissolving would be a consequence of an economic collapse or a bellwether of an economic collapse, but not a cause of one.
Do you think the government would bail out the Big Four or let them dissolve?
They’re all based out of London, and I don’t know how defaults work there. Given their importance and political pull, if they were US-based I imagine they’d get restructured rather than liquidated. Apparently Arthur Anderson hollowed itself despite the possibility of restructuring?
I think it was because Arthur Andersen was also involved in WorldCom, apart from Enron which took him to the grave.
If you have two accounting and auditing scandals, it is better to dissolve than to recover.