this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
817 points (98.9% liked)

World News

41715 readers
4892 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The White House has directed the State and Treasury Departments to draft a proposal for lifting some U.S. sanctions on Russia as part of Trump’s effort to restore ties and end the Ukraine war.

The proposal could ease restrictions on select Russian entities and oligarchs, though it’s unclear what the U.S. would receive in return.

Trump has signaled openness to sanctions relief despite previously threatening harsher measures.

Talks between U.S. and Russian officials have intensified, with economic cooperation, including rare earth minerals, emerging as a key topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

The moron that tried used an AR-15 which shoots a tiny little bullet and not the appropriate calibre. If he had known anything about ballistics we wouldn’t be dealing with this.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's what you get with a bad education system.

I was taught how to consider bullet velocity and trajectory by the government when I was 20.

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You probably also were taught to use at least a 30 calibre bullet like the M21 (which is what the Secret Service used to return fire)

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

I wasn't being trained as an assassin.

Choosing the calibre wouldn't be my prerogative.

What we were shooting with was just 7.62. Which now that I check equates to a .30cal actually. Never knew that, huh.

I did handle some .50cals, but not a sniper rifle, and I don't know how sneaky I could be with a tripod mounted .50cal AA machine gun.

Tldr basic conscription but I did go the longer way voluntarily and am an NCO. I just recalled some basic ballistics lectures from your comment.

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The AR bullet is less than one third the weight and much smaller than the 7.62 round which is why I said it was a shitty choice (and specifically why we still use Korea era armament to this day in the M 21, and 60, mini gun etc (NATO 7.62).

NATO 5.56 Is for ground troops and is designed more to incapacitate

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

7.62 and 5.56 is basically just a choice.

Thats what made us Finns joining NATO so hard (as in a side from all the politics and just practical matters), because we use 7.62 for all ground troops, especially because Russia uses it as well and wed like to be able to scavenge their ammo if they try any special military operations this way.

We've fucking tons of our own make of a AK variant, the RK. RK62 is decent but the sights are shit, RK95TP is awesome. That was my main weapon, had to keep a -62 for 2 months when I was in a poorer regiment for trainining. (Their boots sucked as well everyone from our brigade got a permit from the doc to wear holiday boots for normal service because they were just so much more comfy, like walking on air vs walking in glass.)

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That 7.62 is not the same as NATO 7.62. The AK round has the diameter but not the length, weight or amount of gunpowder.

You are right that it doesn’t matter that much compared to 5.56, for a battle rifle, but NATO 7.62 is much more powerful and weighs a shitload more. It’s what I use to shoot 700m (and as I said above what US special forces still use as the standard sniper rifle M21)

Russia has been using 5.45 since the 70s (The ones with the brown magazine instead of black). I know the Czech SAR models were available in 5.56x45, 5.45x56, and 7.62x39 (NATO is 7.62x51)

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (1 children)

You mean our RK 7.62 or the weird Russian 7.62?

I don't know that much about bullets tbh, it's been closer to 20 years since I was in the army. I do remberer practicing the operation and dismantling and reassembly of the most commonly used Russian 7.62 machine gun(can't remember named model whatever but I do remberer the sequence) and that cartridge was way bigger and kinda clunky but still a 7.62 bullet

Edit wait idk that its the most common but was common enough for us to train against

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 1 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

I don’t know enough about your weapons systems. I only know about US (and thus NATO) small arms and the subsequent AK variants up through the 90s. I have no knowledge of other countries’ squad weapons or larger).

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 21 minutes ago

I looked it up, nato round is 7.62x51, ours is 7.62x39

The Russian machine gun uses 7.62x54mmR

No knowledge of our squad weapons, so maybe not they much from the squads either. Perhaps... You'd enjoy watching some?

Taistelukenttä 2020 | Slagfält 2020 | Battlefield 2020

Some of it is in English but most is Finnish, some Swedish. Excellent CC no ai-generated shit. It's made by the FDF, Finnish Defence Forces. It's essentially a video of what would happen between an invasion if a.. cough cough Eastern neighbour, happened to attack.

Jeesus, I loved being in the army so much and my nowadays person who uses 95% English is such a different person from the person I was when doing my conscription, that I turned on the CC to check it's okay and every sentence gives me could chills for some reason. I know how to translate this obviously. But it's some weird clash between my English personality and Finnish 20y ago personality. Not bad. Good.

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

You don't have to be sneaky, just not fucking miss like the gormless cretin that last tried.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I mean, if you're not sneaky and you're setting up a .50cal turret where they're holding a speech from POTUS, I'm pretty sure someone would have some notes on that.

I mean I'm Finnish, not American and I do understand American gun culture is pretty liberal, but is it that liberal?

Edit but oh boy would I fucking love to open up on that cunt on a stage. CHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOK

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

But he missed because the bullet he used was too small and too light and didn’t have a proper ballistic trajectory

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Also, don't aim for the head. Jesus. Aim for the chest.

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

And why only one shot? Keep pulling that fucking trigger.