this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34828 readers
32 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/1185025

Meta can introduce their signature rage farming to the Fediverse. They don't need to control Mastodon. All they have to do is introduce it in their app. Show every Threads user algorithmically filtered content from the Fediverse precisely tailored for maximum rage. When the rage inducing content came from Mastodon, the enraged Thread users will flood that Mastodon threads with the familiar rage-filled Facebook comment section vomit. This in turn will enrage Mastodon users, driving them to engage, at least in the short to mid term. All the while Meta sells ads in-between posts. And that's how they rage farm the Fediverse without EEE-ing the technology. Meta can effectively EEE the userbase. The last E is something Meta may not intend but would likely happen. It consists of a subset of the Fediverse users leaving the network or segregating themselves in a small vomit-free bubble.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] waspentalive@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would an instance be able to unfederate Facebook/ meta.

[–] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Many are doing so preemptively.

[–] godless@latte.isnot.coffee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't do that preemptively when you don't know what their instance names are going to be.

[–] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone’s account has threads.net highlighted in the profile, so it’s not a huge stretch.

[–] minorsecond@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Spreading this around when I can. Here's how you can personally block threads.net:

https://mastodon.social/@crowgirl@hachyderm.io/110663465300686570

[–] bighi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't they be able to?

[–] waspentalive@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

I am just starting to get used to this federated stuff, adding to my concepts as I go.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, and many are doing it