this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
182 points (98.9% liked)

Cybersecurity

6552 readers
239 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fermiverse@gehirneimer.de 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is really bad as most cheap IOT devices using this chip will not receive an update all.

Would like to see a smartphone app testing this out via bluetooth so we could do some damage control at least and take them offline.

[–] JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network 9 points 22 hours ago

The 'S' in IOT stands for Secure

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago
  1. Have IOT device
  2. It's not secure

How could this have happened???

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Am I misunderstanding the article? It seemed to imply remote intrusion required either Bluetooth proximity, or physical USB access.

[–] Fermiverse@gehirneimer.de 13 points 1 day ago

Correct, but as bluetooth is possible over a certain range, "drive by attacks" might be possible.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

The "attack" is from the host side, any remote attack is theoretical and would depend on exploiting the software on the host first to then gain access to the BT chip.