Asklemmy

45953 readers

1570 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What is still considered a rivalry, even though it's mostly one-sided? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 22 hours ago by venotic@kbin.melroy.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't have any good examples that I know of, but I am very curious. To me though, a rivalry is a rivalry when two or more of people are closely competitive. But is it really a rivalry anymore when someone has more victories over the other? I don't think so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that's really no contest anymore.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The horse has been dead for thousands of years, and the dust of its former corpse has scattered to the wind. Yet somehow, it's still being beaten because anything less would be "woke."

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 hours ago

We are watching them just swing at air at this point.