this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
733 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

5637 readers
818 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 25 points 3 days ago (4 children)

These settings can be good, but are often overdone. See bloom in the late 2000s/early 2010s.

[–] ixlthyxl@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also the ubiquitous "realistic" brown filter a la Far Cry 2 and GTA IV. Which was often combined with excessive bloom to absolutely destroy the player's eyes.

At least in Far Cry 2 you are suffering from malaria.

Yeah, chromatic aberration when done properly is great for emulating certain cameras and art styles. Bloom is designed to make things look even brighter and it's great if you don't go nuts with it. Lens flares are mid but can also be used for some camera stuff. Motion blur is generally not great but that's mainly because almost every implementation of it for games is bad.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I always hated bloom, probably because it was overused. As a light touch it can work, but that is rarely how devs used it.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It's usually better in modern games. In the 2005-2015 era it was often extremely overdone, actually often reducing the perceived dynamic range instead of increasing it IMO.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 2 points 3 days ago

All those features sucked when they first came out, not just bloom.