this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
1251 points (96.2% liked)

Buy European

3128 readers
3102 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Rules

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of buying local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

Matrix Chat

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

!buyFromEU@lemm.ee

!buyfromeu@feddit.org

Buying and Selling:!flohmarkt@lemmy.ca

Boycott:!boycottus@lemmy.ca

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice!stopkillinggames@lemm.ee


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com -3 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Uh... How exactly is China historically expansionist? Isn't Europe much, much worse by any metric at basically any point of history you choose?

[–] Echofox@lemmy.ca 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Annexation of Tibet (1950-1951)

Invasion of Paracel Islands (1974)

Southern Mongolia Annexation (1947-1949)

Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute: China claims the Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu Islands), which are currently controlled by Japan but also claimed by Taiwan.

PROC claims Taiwan as a province, but Taiwan operates as a de facto independent country.

South China Sea (Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia), PROC claims nearly the entire South China Sea under its "Nine-Dash Line", leading to conflicts with Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and others.

India - China claims Arunachal Pradesh as "South Tibet."

But it's important to point out that "China" isn't a country, rather a region. The country people generally refer to when they say "China" is the PROC. If you go back 1000 years there was no "China" country, there was the Ming Empire in the China region. I understand this perspective bothers people, but consider this, if you need to reduce countries to regions then you're going to be bothered for the rest of your life.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Annexation of Tibet (1950-1951)

Southern Mongolia Annexation (1947-1949)

Civil-war era. Calling the liberation of Tibet expansionism is wild.

The rest are basically border conflicts which literally every country in the old continent have.

If you go back 1000 years there was no "China" country, there was the Ming Empire in the China region

You'd be hard-pressed to find a big country with such preservation of language, traditions, culture, architecture and artistic styles, etc. the way China does, idk what's your point

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

How exactly is China historically expansionist?

Tibet used to be a seperate contry. The Uygurs were a Turkic Khanate to themselves.

Bejing's aim is to homogenise those regions instead of preserving their culture and integrate them further economically to China as a whole, which would have the benefit of improved economic outcomes to both "parties" and maintain arts, culture and liberties of the people there.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Tibet used to be a seperate contry

Tibet used to be a feudalist dictatorship where 80% of the population were essentially slaves legally bound to the land of landowners.

Bejing's aim is to homogenise those regions instead of preserving their culture

How many official languages are there in your country?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

How many official languages are there in your country?

a million billion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 0 points 18 hours ago

Nah, I'm not doing a whataboutism, I'm saying that your white ass doesn't have a remote understanding on what "homogenisation" means. Go to a history museum in China, and in most exhibits they'll have some remarks of the history in different places of modern China, and to the different ethnicities of the country, to the point that it would be categorised as PC-inclusivism in the west. And they don't have a far right party fighting to destroy that :)

[–] hoxbug@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Not to mention China making artificial islands around it's coast line to expand it's territory. Boarder clashes with India, territorial disputes with the Philippines, taking over Hong Kong, and ofcourse the constant threatening of taking over Taiwan.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Tibet used to be a seperate contry

300 years ago

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

and the rest of my post regarding how they're being treated?

[–] laolin@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

As far as I know, they Tibetans still speaking Tibetans and practicing their own religion, unlike Okinawans or ainus in Japan who culture and language got wiped out so clean that they couldn’t even sing their old folk songs in their native languages.

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 3 points 18 hours ago

You don’t know much about history of China do you?