this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1135 points (99.7% liked)

Work Reform

11065 readers
1215 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frazw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean he has been rewarded for making the line go up. Part of making the line go up is reducing overheads. So he is being directly rewarded for actions like firing 1000+ employees. So is it a surprise?

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Since I'm sitting negative I should clarify that I do not think the actions are moral. Only that he is incentivized to do things like this.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Just because there's a financial incentive doesn't mean you should do something. This is a step or two below murber for proflt.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I'm never said he should. I'm saying I understand why he did. I would not do the same thing in his position.

Remember most CEO's are psychopaths so they are not very concerned with the impact on the people they fire.