TechTakes

1689 readers

185 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

I find absolutely consistently that gen-AI advocates are literally unable to tell good output from bad output. They think people who say their output is garbage are just lying to have a go at them. (x.com)

submitted 18 hours ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

xcancel: https://xcancel.com/sama/status/1899535387435086115

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe non-judgemental chatbots are a feature only at a higher paid tiers.

it’s rather hilarious that the service is the one throwing the brakes on. I wonder if it’s done because of public pushback, or because some internal limiter applied in the cases where the synthesis drops below some certainty threshold. still funny tho

Haven't used cursor, but I don't see why an LLM wouldn't just randomly do that.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 9 hours ago

a lot of the LLMs and models-of-this-approach blow out when they go beyond window length (and similar-strain cases), yeah, but I wonder if this is them trying to do this because of that or because of other bits

I could also see this being done as "lowering liability" (which is a question that's going to start happening as all the long-known issues of these things start amplifying as more and more dipshits over-rely on them)