I've been trying for days and have been impossible.
All I get is not enough permission to access share from client
`testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Loaded services file OK.
Weak crypto is allowed by GnuTLS (e.g. NTLM as a compatibility fallback)
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
Global parameters
[global]
printcap name = cups
security = USER
usershare allow guests = Yes
usershare max shares = 100
workgroup = SAMBA
idmap config * : backend = tdb
cups options = raw
[homes]
browseable = No
comment = Home Directories
inherit acls = Yes
read only = No
valid users = %S %D%w%S
[printers]
browseable = No
comment = All Printers
create mask = 0600
path = /var/tmp
printable = Yes
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
force group = @printadmin
path = /var/lib/samba/drivers
write list = @printadmin root
[Drive]
guest ok = Yes
path = /var/home/htpc/Drive
read only = No
valid users = htpc`
This is the most convoluted use of basic services I've ever seen just to make Samba work ๐๐๐
Y'know, there's a MUCH simpler way to make this work by just using a regular distribution without these limitations.
What you call a limitation is a way to ensure uptime. Yes, it sometimes involves unique ways of solving problems, but that doesn't mean going with a traditional mutable system is the best option for people's needs.
I have Bazzite on a shared laptop, and knowing that the people who will use it won't have to worry about fucking up the system with a bad update is great peace of mind.
I run thousands of servers and have never had a "bad update" take a node down. Not since the 00's at least.
Lucky you? I can't say the same.
Regardless, OP didn't ask if they should just switch, they asked how to solve their problem. They can decide for themselves if they want to try to use containers or just install traditional Fedora.
Gave them an answer as well.