this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
881 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
5321 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stembolts@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Cable will reach anywhere. There is not such a place that cable "will not reach". Is there a profit incentive to serve you as a customer in a capitalist system? Maybe not. But cable will reach.

[–] MoonHawk@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure if you are in Europe, but in the US there are places where you could walk the width of Germany and see 100 houses. It does not serve to be technically correct here. Also, how would that work with boats / other vehicles and places without infrastructures?

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There are exceptions, but in most cases (in Europe) hardwire should work fine. The problem is that starlink is advertised for any use case.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago)

Their are villages in rural England who don't have fiber. It wouldn't be cost-effective delay it for the six customers that require it.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Well, cable will not reach a warzone which is a rather pertinent use for a satellite communication system at present.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

I know plent of places in my European country where cable does reach, but was made for landline phones and cannot carry any data for internet because its so far from the nearest distribution center. even wireless like microwave can't sustain more than a quality camera feed

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You'd need signal boosters at regular intervals, which need power... so now you're running multiple cables.

But you can't run them too close together as the power will induce noise in the data cable.

And after a long distance even the power needs boosting.

And to protect the cables, you'd need to bury them or put them on poles. Separately.

At a certain point, cable becomes the expensive option...

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Usually fiber is used between cities and in cities and copper is for the "last mile". Usually there is a switching box for the street / building complex

[–] EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

One broken cable can result in a city/town without internet. Speaking from experience.

Also satellites have other uses like GPS

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I doubt they use the same satellites for GPS