this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
-3 points (47.1% liked)
Asklemmy
46624 readers
1248 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I refer you to the changes to Firefox's ToS, restricting downloads of explicit non illegal content, as well as removing the guarantee of data privacy and no data selling.
I don't know what the AI stuff is about, but there's enough here to conclude Firefox will not have the users best interest in mind moving forward and ultimately eliminated their selling point.
The things they did are shady enough.
I'm going to have to read about the download restriction thing. Thanks for pointing that out.
I feel like Mozilla addressed the data sharing thing but I can see how a later clarification might feel disingenuous or that trust was already lost.
I guess I'm still partial to it and find Mozilla relatively much less shady than Google, M$ and Apple. Maybe my bar is set too low and I should be trying less popular browsers to see how I get on with them.