this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1733 points (99.7% liked)

People Twitter

6360 readers
2720 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1733
It's best not to dwell on it (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
139 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

ChatGPT is a tool. Use it for tasks where the cost of verifying the output is correct is less than the cost of doing it by hand.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Honestly, I've found it best for quickly reformatting text and other content. It should live and die as a clerical tool.

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Youre still doing it by hand to verify in any scientific capacity. I only use ChatGPT for philosophical hypotheticals involving the far future. We’re both wrong but it’s fun for the back and forth.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It is not true in general that verifying output for a science-related prompt requires doing it by hand, where "doing it by hand" means putting in the effort to answer the prompt manually without using AI.