this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
56 points (93.8% liked)

Games

18062 readers
219 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Probably not, no

Edit: Actually maybe. Read my comment below

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So I've been reading up on it a little bit and it seems like raytracing is part of Vulkan and DirectX 12, so the APIs shouldn't be proprietary the way CUDA and PhysX are...right?

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

In theory, yea it should. But this is developed by Nvidia with their own graphics cards in mind. If this is similar to Portal RTX, then RDNA3 cards will be able to run it, just with severly crippled performance.

[–] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Yea but isn't AMDs ray tracing performance severely crippled in general? I thought if you want to use ray tracing your far better of buying from team green.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I was under the impression that RDNA3 was still pretty bad at raytracing in general. What I'm really wondering though, having just bought a 9070 XT, is what about RDNA4?

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what are you upgrading from? I've a 3070 and I'm wondering if now's the time to jump back to team red.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A Vega 56. If you think your 3070 might be obsolete we have vastly different perspectives, LOL!

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it's obsolete by any means - it is driving an ultrawide monitor and the RAM upgrade might be nice longer term, this gen is slightly more reasonably priced for AMD, Nvidia driver upgrades are painful on linux, so I wanted to know if there's a significant uplift/how well does it handle RT in comparison to justify a switch for me.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Well, all I know is that it's a significant uplift over a Vega. I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be faster than a 3070, but I'm not sure if it's enough faster to be worth it. I guess if it's on the bubble, AMD playing nicer with Linux might push it over the edge. You should read/watch reviews or something; you'll be able to get much better advice from e.g. Gamer's Nexus than from me.

One thing I will say is that, in my experience, standing in line at Microcenter on launch day is the only way to have a decent chance at getting a video card at MSRP these days. Since you missed that for the 9070 XT, maybe wait until whatever AMD makes next (9070 XTX? 9060? 9080??) comes out and try to get one of those on launch day.

You should definitely not be desperate enough to pay higher-than-MSRP prices just to get more RAM and easier to deal with drivers.