this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
419 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
4613 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Modern large commercial buildings already suck down this amount and more.

And how mamy cars in said building? How many will be allowed to charge at the same time? Should we expect same grid for large commercial buildings and rural charging stations?

If there's literally one place in America we need to throw money at, it's the electrical grid.

We have a decades out of date power infrastructure, Europe especially has us beat.

Just like electrification originally, and later the internet, increasing power delivery will have benefits for everyone that pay off for centuries .

Mostly we need to make the grid far smarter.

Evs should be allowed to load coordinate with the grid, so they switch on at the optimum times for grid stability in exchange for major discounts on power.

A superload like this one should have to request clearance, then the grid compensates by reducing 'cheap ev power' in the area, while also requesting evs configured for v2g to be ready to possibly supply.

The supercharger has a slightly higher cost per kwh to make up for this, but that is the cost of convenience.