this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
719 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

31072 readers
112 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.org 42 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I wonder if this will in practice put an end to the scummy practice of badly sized in game currency pack sizes, one of the many scummy techniques they use to make people spend more.

Let’s say the thing most players buy costs 3 ingame currency (I love that my autocorrect made „insane currency“ out of that). The smallest pack you can buy is 5. So, the player buys 5, spends 3 and has 2 left with which nothing to do. If they want another 3, they have to buy 5 more. Spend 3, have 4 left. Spend 3, have 1 left. The cycle continues.

[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Or, just stop games from selling in-game content?

Every skin is a texture or model swap, every "exclusive" always exists in the files, every in-game currency is fabricated.

Games try really really hard to make you pay for something that is copy and pasted

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago

This is one of those radical ideas that people are terrified of, because it would kill the business models of a lot of massive corporations. It's easy to spin that as the death of the game industry, rather than what it is: the death of a business practice.

Like the laws against underage smoking probably wiped out billions in shareholder value, but that was objectively a good thing. Banning (or heavily regulating) in-game purchases would also be a good thing, no matter how much it affects existing players. If it leads to the death of name brands like EA, Ubisoft, etc. then who cares? The market will readjust and new players who were able to adapt to the changed environment will take their place.

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Artificial scarcity in it's barest form.

The fact that even some people think this shit is acceptable is very telling of how far we have yet to go, psychologically speaking, as a species.

Monkeys in fucking trousers.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If anything gaming culture has regressed, at least in this aspect.

Remember when the $2.50 Oblivion horse armor DLC was considered to be ridiculous?

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 1 points 15 hours ago

Remember when the $2.50 Oblivion horse armor DLC was considered to be ridiculous?

Blizzard now sells mounts at the price of 90 EUR, ~1.5x the base price of the game itself...

TBF, it's a useful mount, but 90 fucking Euros...