this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
245 points (95.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35834 readers
1208 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Against what sort of attack? Who's the attacker? What capabilities do they have? What do they want?


There's a saying, "locks are to keep your friends out." If someone really means you harm, a lock is not going to keep them out: they can smash a window, break down the door, or hit you with a rubber hose until you give them your keys or passwords. This applies no matter what kind of lock you have.

But a lock represents a social barrier: everyone knows that trying to defeat someone else's lock is a hostile act. The law recognizes this in many places: breaking-and-entering is a more severe crime than trespassing.

A lock may slow down an attacker. It may redirect an attacker to go after your neighbor's stuff instead of your stuff — but not if everyone has locks.


A password lock has some advantages over a key lock. You don't have to issue physical keys to everyone you want to allow in. Many allow you to create and revoke passwords separately — so you can grant a friend access to your house while you're away, and then revoke it when they no longer need it.

However, a password lock also has some disadvantages. If you give a password to one person, that person can easily give it to everyone. That's a lot harder with a physical key, because they'd have to go make a lot of copies of that key — which, if nothing else, costs money and time.

A computerized lock can create an audit trail: it can record when it was opened, and even which credentials (passwords, keys, ...) were used to unlock it.

Any lock can have vulnerabilities — most common key locks can be picked; computerized locks can be attacked through their computer hardware or software.

[–] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber-hose_cryptanalysis

In cryptography, rubber-hose cryptanalysis is a euphemism for the extraction of cryptographic secrets (e.g. the password to an encrypted file) from a person by coercion or torture—such as beating that person with a rubber hose, hence the name—in contrast to a mathematical or technical cryptanalytic attack.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

There’s also just the social engineering side of it. I guessed my father’s door code just because I know his birthdate.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Beat me to it! Locks are just but one part of securing your home.

[–] cloudless@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is for a house in a residential area, and I don't keep a lot of valuables in the house. I wish I knew who the attacker would be, so I can catch them with pre-crime.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you're concerned about burglars, one problem is that if they decide to hit your house, they can just break a window.

Where I live, burglars often hit cars rather than houses; and they're very willing to break windows to get in, especially if they see something valuable in the car. They spend no time trying to defeat the locks — hell, some don't even check if the car is locked. They're pros; they've practiced smashing a window and looting the car quickly.

A lot of the loss due to burglary is the damage the burglar does on the way in, rather than the value of the things stolen. And upgrading locks does nothing to reduce this.

Maybe instead of upgrading your locks, you might be better off spending the same amount of money upgrading your insurance?

[–] SlightlyMad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you an insurance salesman? Because this script probably would have worked on me!

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Here's a sillier economic take on it:

Locks should be difficult enough to break that if you can develop the skills to break them, you're smart enough to get a real job and not be a burglar.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cars have historically been broken into and stolen a lot. Thus auto makers have put extra effort into good locks. Some hardware store deadbolts are so bad you anyone can pick them with lock picks - no instructions needed. Only the best deadbolts are equal what a car has. Likewise breaking a car window is typically harder than breaking a house window.

[–] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Likewise breaking a car window is typically harder than breaking a house window.

All it takes to break a car window is a single tap. There's specific tools available, or someone can just use a shard of ceramic. Shatters completely and instantly.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, if you have that tool. If you don't have that tool though a rock you find won't work unlike many house windows.

[–] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

$10 on Amazon. Or just a piece of broken spark plug. Anyone who seriously wants to break a car window will have something handy.

Or maybe thieves are just walking down the street and see a fancy bag on a seat and a rock and just decide to do the deed on a whim and get foiled by tempered glass. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Shhh, most thieves don't know that and are taking cheap opportunity.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I love my August smart lock. It auto-unlocks my door when I get home, so I never need keys or to reach for my phone. It also has a key pad to unlock if I dont have my phone. It has alerts and reports status on an app. I can unlock or lock the door remotely for people to check in on things for me while Im away.

Yes, it has issues and eats batteries, but its so convenient.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're not in infosec you should be. (Source: am in infosec)

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, I did that for a while. 2001 was a mess of a year ... right after the planes started flying again after 9/11, the Nimda worm came out.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that was a rough time indeed. I recall getting hit with a couple of those big worms back to back.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

2002 was a blur, and then in 2003 came SQL Slammer.