this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
283 points (99.3% liked)

News

28270 readers
5993 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has previously expressed opposition to women serving in combat, has ordered the military to develop gender-neutral physical fitness standards for frontline troops, a memo released Monday said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regrub@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Probably motivated by the idea that separate standards for men and women is also "woke DEI". Don't imagine for a second that their actions are made with good intentions

[–] WorldsDumbestMan 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Regardless if they are, I don't get why people get so worked up over the different standards for men and women being rewoked. It's a shitty job anyway.

It's not a contest to see who is better, it is not a reward for good behavior, it is a necessity. If you have lower standards for women, why not just have lower standards for men too? Same shit.

You can have weaker men serving and get the same results: more people in the army.

If you can't get into the army, then so fucking what? Making standards for women lower, only makes them equal on paper. In-practice, you are putting a political message over function. You are being run by jealousy where there needs to be none.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because standards are first and foremost about maintaining a healthy force. Then they find a number that allows for being healthy and operating in combat. That's the minimum and you get points for going above that, and discharged for not meeting it. I guarantee you they aren't keeping women around as a DEI thing where they're only equal on paper.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan 2 points 23 hours ago

I don't care about DEI. But yes, that explains it.

Thank you, you actually changed my view unironically.